Why Settling for a Situationship is the Worst Dating Advice I’ve Ever Ignored (And You Should Too)

Okay ladies, let’s get real for a sec—when was the last time a man’s “good morning” text actually improved your life? 🌝 I used to think keeping things “casual” made me a ~cool girl~ until I spent six months crying over someone who called me “dude” during sex. Modern dating feels like swiping through a grocery store where all the avocados are either rock-hard or suspiciously bruised. But here’s the tea: discernment isn’t about being picky. It’s about refusing to play emotional whack-a-mole with people who treat connection like a TikTok trend.
Let’s talk about the “spark” myth. Last year, I went on 14 first dates with guys who checked my superficial boxes (tall, witty, owned more than one houseplant). Zero second dates. Why? Because chemistry ≠ compatibility. My therapist dropped this bomb: “You’re mistaking anxiety butterflies for attraction.” 😳 Turns out, stable connection often feels… boring at first. A 2023 study from Oxford found that couples who built emotional intimacy before physical chemistry reported 62% higher long-term satisfaction. Translation: Slow your roll, sister.
Now onto the ick epidemic. My friend Jess recently ghosted a guy because he used the word “moist” unironically. Meanwhile, she’s been tolerating a situationship with a finance bro who sends 🍆 pics during earnings calls. We’ve normalized treating dealbreakers like quirks while inventing reasons to bail on decent humans. Newsflash: Discerning ≠ finding perfection. It means knowing your non-negotiables (mine: emotional availability, respects my career, doesn’t pronounce GIF as “jiff”).
The real power move? Becoming the prize. I used to “accidentally” leave toothbrushes at guys’ apartments like some rom-com stalker. Now? My dating profile says “Looking for someone who’s done the work.” Cue the shocked Pikachu faces when men actually step up. Recent data shows women who articulate clear standards get 40% fewer matches—but 300% higher quality interactions. Worth it.
Here’s where it gets spicy: Discernment requires ruthless self-honesty. I once dated a guy who quoted Rumi but couldn’t name his therapist. Turns out I was avoiding real intimacy by chasing poetic red flags. Psychologists call this “trauma repetition”—we subconsciously seek familiar dysfunction. Breaking the cycle means asking “Does this feel peaceful?” rather than “Is this dramatic enough for my next memoir?”
Final thought: Modern love isn’t about decoding mixed signals. It’s about becoming fluent in your own worth. Next time someone says “I’m not ready for labels,” smile and say “Great! I’m not ready to waste my ovulation years.” � Your future self will pour champagne on your grave. Metaphorically. Probably.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *